e-MFP — Sources & Relationship Boundaries
This page explains how DHULFIKAR uses e-MFP sources and what conclusions must not be drawn from them.
Relationship status
DHULFIKAR features e-MFP here as an organisation whose public work deserves recognition and from which DHULFIKAR can learn. This is not the same as a formal relationship.
Based on the documentation currently held for this section, DHULFIKAR therefore does not claim:
- partnership;
- endorsement;
- membership;
- certification;
- assessment of DHULFIKAR;
- approval;
- funding or investment;
- sponsorship;
- regulatory authorisation;
- independent validation of DHULFIKAR outcomes.
What is documented
An exploratory exchange of information took place in September 2026. Maria Ollé of e-MFP directed DHULFIKAR towards public e-MFP sources and subsequently indicated that DHULFIKAR could use the open resources to draw greater attention to e-MFP's work. She also recommended following the newsletter for future community and e-MFP updates.
Our source-first approach
For factual information about e-MFP, we prefer official e-MFP pages. When applying an insight to DHULFIKAR, we seek to keep three layers separate:
- Source fact. What does the original source actually say?
- DHULFIKAR interpretation. Why is that relevant to our development?
- DHULFIKAR consequence. Which product question, safeguard, evidence gate or roadmap action might follow?
Copyright and visual materials
This section aims to return traffic and recognition to original sources. DHULFIKAR therefore does not automatically reuse e-MFP photographs, charts, reports or substantial passages of text. Public accessibility does not mean that every image or publication is freely reusable.
Main official sources
Last reviewed by DHULFIKAR: 23 September 2026.